 |
(Natural News) The Wall Street Journal has been reporting on a study out of Stanford University that was published in the medical journal medRxiv which suggests the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) may not be as deadly as initially believed. But several of the study’s co-authors were the ones who wrote these Journal articles in support of... |
WSJ writer hyping "Stanford study" was actually a co-author on the paper, but didn't declare his bias
Continue Reading
Bagikan Berita Ini
Related Posts :
Essential oils prove to be an effective treatment for ADHD- Marxist Democrats are exploiting young people like David Hogg to push “revolution” in America
- Another danger of antibiotic overuse: It undermines other therapies, such as cancer treatments
- New film documents “conspiracy” of massive government takeover of Western lands in quest to own ALL natural resources
- State of Ohio sues DuPont for dumping toxic chemicals in the Ohio River
0 Response to "WSJ writer hyping "Stanford study" was actually a co-author on the paper, but didn't declare his bias"
Post a Comment